This article does an excellent job
at explaining the competency-based learning models I have discussed. It is more
of a flexible hybrid course with learning sessions and assessments being
separate along with having support available for our students. http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI7066.pdf
Tuesday, April 23, 2013
Tuesday, April 16, 2013
Going Beyond the Credit Hours
The conversations about direct assessments continue. Below is an article on going beyond the credit hour, which is a great thing to do. However, we should also stay focus on the other higher education mission, which is to provide a learning environment. Even those with previous experience can learn more and become even more of a well-rounded individual.
http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2013/03/19/feds-give-nudge-competency-based-education
Labels:
assessment,
college credits,
higher education
Wednesday, April 10, 2013
Letting Students Choose their Learning Platform
More than 30% of college students nation-wide take at least
one online course (http://sloanconsortium.org/news_press/january2013_new-study-over-67-million-students-learning-online).
I’m sure there were several reasons for this (not withstanding that some
courses are only offered inline due to declines in enrollment). Other reasons may fall in line for the purpose
of online education such as flexibility, convenience, practicality from the
student’s perspective.
What if we were to combine this? The hybrid format comes up
where students attend a portion of the class online and the other portion in
person.
What if we did it better? We give the student the total
option of attendance. The material is delivered in various ways: online and
in-person; then, giving the option to the student as to what format they wish
to learn from.
It may not be quite just from a learning standpoint to
expect a commitment to all-online or all-live for the full quarter or semester without
taking under consideration that even within a course material can be best delivered
in various ways and people learn things differently depending on the concept. With
this in mind, the commitment is then to complete the content of the course and
all the required assessments in a certain period of time regardless of where
the information came from.
Of course, as higher education, we should create a model
example of credible, valid, and reliable sources of information by developing
material to be delivered in various ways (and sharing).
Tuesday, April 2, 2013
Universities earn an F accoring to Strategy-Business
While colleges and universities accomplish their goal of
educating their students and awarding degrees based on what the students have
demonstrated they know, this article points out a few areas in which we can do
better: completion, cost, employer
needs, retention, and others: http://www.strategy-business.com/article/00147?gko=da535
Tuesday, March 26, 2013
Breaking SLO's into 3 areas: Delivery, Assessment, and Support
More of my thoughts on this idea of competency based learning: break the student learning outcomes (SLO’s) into 3 distinct sections:
(1)
Delivery of Material – This can be done in (a)
the form of online resources within and outside of Blackboard (videos, lecture
recordings, etc.) and (b) the form of lecture series (learning sessions)
focusing on specific SLO content – there are some SLO’s that cross courses, so
why “teach” them to each different group. For example, courses that all deal with MS Office Software. If they share a common
SLO, then they can share the material delivery as well. These learning sessions
do not have to be 50 minutes or 1:15; they are as long as it takes to deliver
the material. A schedule, of course, would have to be provided in advance.
(2)
Assessment of Student – This does not have to be
done by the same person who delivered the material. In fact, why not have the
checks and balance? The assignments are assessed by faculty credentialed for
the SLO of each of the courses. Using the same example above, the student would
attend a learning session where they learned to create tables. Then s/he would
create the tables in MS Word (or the appropriate word processor) and submit them to the appropriate faculty member for
assessment.
(3)
Student Support – Here’s where lab space and
tutors come in. We need to have the ability to provide support for students in
two ways: (a) tutoring and content assistance in order to help students better
understand the material in order to successfully complete the assessment. (b)
General student support – someone the student can go to for anything. This
person would also contact the student if they are not attending (participating)
and/or not submitting assignments (assignments that are submitted and need help
improving are taken care of in 3a).
It is certainly a different view.
Wednesday, March 20, 2013
Do we want a surgeon, construction worker, etc. to do (know) only 70% of the work?
Students are shooting for a passing grade regardless of how many competencies they fail to demonstrate. Competency based learning is
definitely a great idea for assessment of student learning outcomes (SLO) and
ensuring students are capable to perform ALL of the objectives to a minimum. I
think I’ve shared with some of you the idea that a 70% C does no longer mean
that the student completed each of the assignments with a 70% proficiency. It
can mean that the student only did 70% of the work and left off those remaining
30% for whatever reason without completion.
The only way to ensure the
complete assessment of all SLO’s for a course is to require a level of success
for each SLO. Some of them may be set at 70%; others that are more important can
be higher and even up to 100% proficiency. We should ensure the assessment of
student proficiency of each and every SLO.
Monday, March 4, 2013
Re-Evals on Pre-reqs
Figure out how we can determine what content is actually needed prior to a
course. For instance, those with a pre-req of English (what in the ENGL101
is exactly what you are looking for?). This will then help us create a structure
of support for the students and possibly eliminate some of the pre-reqs that are
preventing students from moving forward (because they may be able to master that
one or two concepts in the pre-req course, but have to take the entire course to
prove it).
In the end, there has to be a
better way. Or we can do this: http://www.collegehumor.com/video/6406388/salting-the-road-the-hard-way.
We have the equipment, so we just have to use it to work for our advantage.
:)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
